|
— As
printed in the June 1999 issue of Lubes & Greases
“Chemical management is outsourcing,” Fortin
says. “Under chemical management, a single supplier provides
all chemicals, chemical services, analytical, inventory control,
chemical process and information management services through the
supplier’s on-site personnel. It’s a team approach that
decreased the supplier base, provides increased supplier involvement,
defines accountability and immediately reduces costs.”
Speaking at the Independent Lubricant Manufacturers
Association’s Mid-Year Meeting, Fortin - whose company derives
90 percent of its revenue supplying chemical management services
- described today’s chemical management market. The automotive
industry, including assembly, parts, and metal fabricating plants,
“is the most mature industry for chemical management,”
Fortin says. “It’s becoming increasingly integrated,
with one manager for paints, lubes, solvents, cleaners, waste treatment,
all the chemicals”.
“General industry is ripe for chemical management”,
Fortin continues, “with less than 5 percent using chemical
management. In the electronics industry, less than 2 percent use
chemical management. Steel and paper are dinosaur industries for
chemical management. It will be at least five years before steel
truly embraces chemical management. Paper is a little more advanced,
but in the paper industry we’re seeing more single suppliers
than true chemical managers.”
Fortin also sees a large market among smaller manufacturing
concerns. “At Haas, our smallest account is $300,000, with
no full-time person on-site. I believe there is a large market (in
accounts) under $1 million.”
The overwhelming reason is to control operating costs. But it’s
not the only reason. “Chemical management makes your problems
someone else’s, and they have the expertise to solve them”,
says Fortin.
“The old way companies purchased chemicals,”
Fortin says, “was to have a large supplier base supplying
a large number of chemicals. With large chemical inventories, the
cost of materials in inventory can be as high as five times the
cost of materials in use”.
Under this traditional approach, the supplier’s
profit is based on the volume of chemicals used. “You also
find a lack of supplier responsibility and accountability, resistance
to change, and environmental compliance and worker health and safety
problems”.
Under the chemical management approach “the
chemical manager is your general contractor, and the ‘tier
two’ suppliers are subcontractors,” Fortin explains.
A single manager supplies all chemicals for a plant, says Fortin,
and the customer purchases chemical services, not chemicals. White
the chemical manager supplies materials, management, analytical,
inventory control and information systems, the customer maintains
control since its own employees coordinate overall management.
“The chemical manager becomes a key team player
in the plant,” says Fortin. There can be just-in-time inventory
of chemicals and more effective use of technology. “The chemical
manager is paid a fixed fee, often on a parts-produced bases, and
profits are based on service”.
Asked why the major oil companies aren’t more
dominant in chemical management, Fortin notes that they do have
some chemical management accounts, both as first - and second-tier
suppliers. “But chemical management is a usage reduction business,
and personally, I see them as pounds-out-the-door refineries. Their
core competence is bulk sales. Plus majors have high overhead, and
chemical management is entrepreneurial, with a lot of risk.”
The most significant benefit, Fortin says, is “immediate,
substantial cost savings, including chemicals, maintenance and paperwork
costs, water and energy reduction.” At Haas, he says, “we
guarantee cost reductions to our customers.” And Fortin sees
a long list of other benefits. “You’ll prevent pollution
by reducing chemical consumption. You’ll have a quantifiable
reduction of regulatory reporting needs.” With fewer types
of chemicals and less waste generation, the user can reduce health
and safety risks and liability.
Standardization of specifications, systems and procedures
is another benefit. “At General Motors, for example, their
initiative is to standardize their chemical management program globally,”
says Fortin. “It’s similar to McDonald’s, where
the quality and standards are consistent worldwide”.
“Chemical management has a beneficial impact
on all environmental systems, including waste treatment,”
Fortin continues. “You realize the cost reductions by developing
a supplier base focused on providing cost effective services rather
than volume sales.”
Chemical managers, or tier-one suppliers, look for the second-tier
suppliers who offer high levels of service and technical ability
above all else, Fortin says. “We look for tier twos who have
their corporation product approvals in place and understand chemical
management. They must be willing to share the risks and the rewards,
and be creative in reducing chemical usage.”
Unlike many chemical management vendors, Haas does
not view the manufacturers and sales of its own chemicals as critical
to its revenue and profitability. (Chemical manufacturing accounts
for less that 10 percent of Haas Corp.’s business, Fortin
notes).
“The chemical manager should be the gatekeeper,
the filter between the customer and the tier-two suppliers of the
chemicals themselves,” Fortin says.
“Tier-two suppliers should look for the tier
ones who are willing to pay for the expertise and service”
Fortin says. “Look for the first-tier chemical managers who
want to reduce chemical usage, not tier-two profits. The chemical
manager should provide incentives for achieving mutual goals, and
should not offer competing products.”
“Both sides, tier one and two, must view the
relationship as a partnership.”
|