|
|
— As
printed in the 12/20/2000 issue of Chemical Week
HAAS CORP. (WEST CHESTER, PA) seized an opportunity to provide chemical
management services (CMS) to General Motors (GM), Ford, and other
major companies in the automotive and aerospace sectors and has
run with it. Since winning its first comprehensive CMS contract
for GM in 1994, Hass’s sales have risen from $5 million/year,
to $28 million in 1999, and should reach nearly $38 million this
year says Thad Fortin, Hass’s CEO. The family owned company
provides CMS at plants in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and China.
When Fortin’s father bought Haas in 1975, the
company was a manufacturer and distributor of metal treatment chemicals.
Haas got a big break in the early 1980’s by developing a furfural
alcohol-based paint stripper to substitute for methylene chloride
in auto factory paint shops, and was able to pick up sales at auto
plants throughout North America. By the late 1980’s, Haas
was being invited to take on chemical management work at auto plants,
in addition to supplying chemicals.
When GM started to outsource CMS as its plats in the
early 1990’s, Haas was ideally placed to win business, as
the paint shop accounts for three-quarters of chemical usage in
an auto plant, says Fortin. Haas’s first comprehensive CMS
contract was GM’s Baltimore facility, followed in 1996 by
a contract at GM’s giant Oshawa, ON plant, North America’s
largest auto assembly facility. Haas now has nine auto assembly
plants, sex power-train plants, and 20 auto parts plants under contract,
as well as two aerospace accounts. The company has 45 employees
in the U.S., 20 in Canada, 100 in Mexico, and 15 in China, where
it provides CMS for Buick’s Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp.
joint venture.
Haas’s business is growing rapidly because of
the cost savings CMS provides, says Fortin. Chemical manufacture
accounts for under 5% of its sales. Haas advises it’s customers
on how to reduce chemical usage and improve handling to minimize
waste generaton. The reduced volumes translate into savings in inventory
carrying, waste treatment, and safety and environmental management,
and multiply the initial savings on reduced chemical purchases by
a factor of five to 10. “For every dollar spent on chemicals,
the cost burden is five to 10 times that,” says Fortin. “That’s
what our customers realize.” --DH
|
«
go back to
Print Articles Index
Follow the links below
for additional information:
|
|